Cases 91 - 100 of 105
Gentry v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Devion Gentry
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Nottoway Correctional Center, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Farmville City et al
as 3:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Farmville City, Prince Edwards County, Peidmont Reginonal Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Hampton City Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00341
Plaintiff:
Antoine Beasley
Defendant:
Hampton City Jail and Captain Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Bowen et al
as 1:2016cv00722
Plaintiff:
Tashawn Thorne
Defendant:
Ms. Bowen, Ms. L. Smith, Mrs. Sgt. Tisdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jack v. Chapman et al
as 3:2016cv00316
Plaintiff:
James L. Jack
Defendant:
Michael L. Chapman, Sean Dikeman, Deputy Rima and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brent Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Barak Obama, Loretta Lynch, Attorney General, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northcraft v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Stuart Northcraft
Defendant:
David Simons, Major Hachet, Sgt Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feagin v. Virginia Beach City Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Feagin
Defendant:
Abdull Jamaludeen, Captain Vergas and Ken Stolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carnes, Sr. et al v. Unknown et al
as 1:2015cv00840
Plaintiff:
Mark Wendel Carnes, Sr. and Captain Rachel
Defendant:
Unknown and Leonard Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. McCabe et al
as 1:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Mayfield
Defendant:
Bob McCabe, Colonel Borum, Captain Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
