Cases 1 - 10 of 1,699
McGilton v. Straughn
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Brent L.V. McGilton
Defendant:
Shawn Straughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Joseph I. Patterson, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Heather Ray and FBOP Director Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nicholas v. Fairmont State Police et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
James Nicholas
Defendant:
Fairmont State Police and Steven Fitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Beane et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Martin Riley Robinson
Defendant:
Honorable Judge John D. Beane, Russ Skogstad, Talia Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Daniel Mackey
Respondent:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Capt. Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Rosa-Tejeda v. Flemming
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel De La Rosa-Tejeda
Defendant:
CO Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lovett et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
William C. Brown
Defendant:
Warden Lovett and Dr. Gregory Mimms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hueston v. Brown et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
David E. Hueston
Respondent:
R. Brown and Dr. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morrison v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ethan Morrison
Defendant:
Corporal Waylen Miller and Corporal N. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
