Land Condemnation Cases filed in Virginia
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC. v. 0.12 Acres of Land, Owned by William Emmett Martin and Janice Eaton Martin, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC.
Defendant: 0.12 Acres of Land, Owned by William Emmett Martin and Janice Eaton Martin, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 1.05 Acres of Land, Owned by William Emmett Martin and Janice Eaton Martin, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and 3.39 Acres of Land, Owned by William Emmett Martin and Janice Eaton Martin, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.04 Acres of Land, Owned by Ronald B. Edwards, Sr., Gloria Martin, Terrance Edwards, Linda White, Ruby Penn, Janis E. Waller, Crystal Diane Edwards, and Penny Edwards Blue
as 7:2022cv00324
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.04 Acres of Land, Owned by Ronald B. Edwards, Sr., Gloria Martin, Terrance Edwards, Linda White, Ruby Penn, Janis E. Waller, Crystal Diane Edwards, and Penny Edwards Blue
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.94 Acres of Land, Owned by Martin G. Morrison and Patricia A. Boyd
as 7:2022cv00317
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.94 Acres of Land, Owned by Martin G. Morrison and Patricia A. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant: 1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 2.93 Acres of Land, Owned by Lois King Waldron and Lois Mabel Waldron Martin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2019cv00150
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 2.93 Acres of Land, Owned by Lois King Waldron and Lois Mabel Waldron Martin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Giles County, Craig County, Montgomery County, Roanoke County, Franklin County, and Pittsylvania County, Vir et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2017cv00492
Defendant: 1.97 Acres of Land, Owned by Keith M. Wilson and Mary K. Wilson, 3.76 Acres of Land, Owned by Catherine Beckner Kingery, 2.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Howard M. Thompson and Christine W. Thompson and others
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Amicus Curiae: Tammy Belinsky and Daniel Breslau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. A permanent easement totaling 0.889 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 0.859 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 25.00 acres in et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00405
Plaintiff: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant: A permanent easement totaling 0.889 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 0.859 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 25.00 acres in, Jacqueline Roach Yarrell, Marion Roach Nesby and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?