Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kevin McKoy et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00078
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin McKoy, Peggy Landers, Brenda Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Rodgers et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv06974
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Rodgers, Howard Jackson, Stephanie Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bowens et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv06020
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Bowens, Daryl Carter, Tina Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bowen v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 1:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Edward Bowen
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alfaro et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Alfaro, Bonnie Anz, William Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sanchez et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2022cv00029
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin P Sanchez, Roger Scharmen, Tamela Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv03260
Plaintiff:
Duane Roberts, Juventino Sagrero-Perez, Billy Moore and others
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
