Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Isner v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Karla S. Isner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Tarley v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Phillis Tarley
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, United States of America and Christopher Alan Parrotta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Tarley v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
Spencer Cole Tarley
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, United States of America and Christopher Alan Parrotta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cooper v. The United States Of America
as 5:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Virgil Cooper
Defendant:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Skeens v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2014cv15877
Plaintiff:
Sharon Skeens
Defendant:
United States of America and Steve Arlin Viney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Schillace et al v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
Rhonda L. Schillace and Gregory H. Schillace
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lancaster et al v. Anderson et al
as 5:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Debra Lancaster and Darrell Lancaster
Defendant:
Teresa Anderson, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Gillispie v. Panik et al
as 3:2012cv00612
Plaintiff:
Homer Gillispie
Defendant:
Michael D. Panik and Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of KY, LLC
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hamilton v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00416
Plaintiff:
Scott Hamilton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Moore, et al v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kelley Moore and Lynne E. Moore
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
