Cases 51 - 60 of 284
Ray v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06679
Plaintiff:
Gladys C. Ray
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05232
Plaintiff:
Lou Ann Ray and James T. Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shoemake v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv04921
Plaintiff:
Velma Ray Shoemake
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04884
Plaintiff:
Betty L. Marcel and Ray A. Marcel, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luman et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv04186
Plaintiff:
Joan Luman and Larry Ray Luman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hale et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03495
Plaintiff:
Janice Lucille Hale and Michael Ray Hale
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03465
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Joan Ellis and William Ray Ellis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spadafore et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00928
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Spadafore and Ray Spadafore
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31377
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Ann Ray
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv31279
Plaintiff:
Cathleen Jean Thompson and Ray Thompson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
