Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jones v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2009cv00249
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott Jones
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton Company, Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jones et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dean Jones and Donna T. Jones
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JONES v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00572
Plaintiff:
GARLAND EDWARD JONES
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00329
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene Jones and Amy Jones
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00111
Plaintiff:
Thad Dale Jones and Brenda M. Jones
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
A. W. Chesterton Company and Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Fluor Daniel Services Corporation, General Refractories Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Murphy et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Wayne Gordon Murphy and Katie Jones Murphy
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg Warner Corporation, CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
A. W. Chesterton Company
Cross Defendant:
Fluor Daniel Services Corporation, General Refractories Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Thompson, et al v. St. Paul Travelers
as 5:2004cv00342
Plaintiff:
Shawna Hazard, Vincent James Gugliemo, Berta Cortan and others
Defendant:
St. Paul Travelers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
