Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Boyd et al
as 5:2019cv00293
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
James V. Boyd, Diana Boyd, John Doe Entity d/b/a House of SIn and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. JAMES, ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00533
Defendant:
JOHN DOE ENTITY, ERIC B. JAMES, JOHN DOE ENTITY doing business as ROYAL LIFE VIP WELLNESS SPA & EVENT CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication/Use of Communications
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. SWINEHART et al
as 1:2018cv00518
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
DIANE E. SWINEHART and JOHN DOE ENTITY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc., et al v. Copeland, et al
as 7:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Shann Copeland and John Doe Entity
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Blackburn et al
as 7:2011cv00276
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
John Blackburn and Boars Breath, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Blackburn et al
as 5:2011cv00759
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
John Blackburn and Boars Breath, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
JOE HAND PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. BOYD, et al
as 1:2011cv00957
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DAVID BOYD and SALISBURY RIDGE VENTURES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. PARK et al
as 1:2011cv00841
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN D. PARK and RODIES TAVERN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
DIRECTV, INC. v. SHORE et al
as 1:2009cv00707
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, INC.
Defendant:
DEANNA B. SHORE, JOHN RANSOM SHORE, CHRISTINA FITZPATRICK BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication/Use of Communications
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
