Cases 101 - 110 of 6,819
Young, Jr. v. Kendall
as 9:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Michael J. Young, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brian Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Jansen
as 2:2023cv06977
Petitioner:
Derrick A. Jones
Respondent:
Warden Sean Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Jackson
as 4:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Demarcus Robinson
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PLAZA ESTACIO v. OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 5:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ADRIAN PLAZA ESTACIO
Defendant:
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Stirling et al
as 0:2023cv06978
Plaintiff:
Robert Dexter Thomas, III
Defendant:
Brian Stirling and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2023cv06931
Petitioner:
Christopher S. Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Sharp
as 5:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Brandon J Berry
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Godbee v. Graham
as 2:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Burnett Godbee
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Joseph
as 2:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott
Respondent:
K. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Franklin v. Warden FCI Bennettsville
as 4:2023cv06591
Petitioner:
Benny W. Franklin
Respondent:
Warden FCI Bennettsville and Warden, F.C.I. Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
