Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Jones v. Joseph
as 9:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
Alonzo Tarell Jones
Respondent:
Warden M Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Nelson, Warden
as 2:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Kemonie Lashawn Jones
Respondent:
K. Nelson, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Jansen
as 2:2023cv06977
Petitioner:
Derrick A. Jones
Respondent:
Warden Sean Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Jackson
as 5:2023cv04879
Petitioner:
Anthony Jones
Respondent:
S Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. The State of South Carolina
as 9:2023cv03015
Petitioner:
Edward G. Jones
Respondent:
The State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Janson
as 1:2023cv01776
Petitioner:
Tadarrius Omar Jones
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Warden, Orangeburg-Calhoun Regional Detention Center
as 0:2022cv03821
Petitioner:
Jay'Lyn Jones
Respondent:
Orangeburg-Calhoun Regional Center and Warden, Orangeburg-Calhoun Regional Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Richardson et al
as 9:2022cv02161
Petitioner:
Edward G. Jones
Respondent:
Doug Richardson, Stuart Sarrat and Director of the Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Jones v. Dunbar
as 0:2022cv01379
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McSharry v. Stirling et al
as 1:2022cv00770
Petitioner:
Jennifer L. McSharry
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Patricia Jones-Yeldell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
