Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Jones v. Dept. of Corr. et al
as 7:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Dennis Aubrey Jones
Respondent:
Dept. of Corr., Gov. Glenn Youngkin and Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00613
Petitioner:
Jermaine Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fitchett v. Jones, Jr.
as 1:2023cv00383
Petitioner:
Durell Fitchett
Respondent:
Bruce D. Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Buckingham Department of Corrections, Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2022cv00685
Petitioner:
Arthur Jones
Respondent:
Warden Buckingham Department of Corrections, Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Leu
as 1:2022cv00829
Petitioner:
Zachary Wayne Jones
Respondent:
Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Hamilton
as 2:2022cv00251
Petitioner:
Markelyn Lamontre Jones
Respondent:
Israel Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2022cv00278
Petitioner:
Tehgrain Jamal Jones
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fitchett v. Jones
as 1:2022cv00038
Petitioner:
Durell Fitchett
Respondent:
Bruce D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Daniels
as 2:2021cv00330
Petitioner:
Daryl Lamont Jones
Respondent:
Christopher Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Director, Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2021cv00311
Respondent:
Director, Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner:
Markese L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
