Cases 51 - 60 of 108
Sims-Lewis v. Debrosse et al
as 1:2017cv03125
Plaintiff:
Raymond Sims-Lewis
Defendant:
P/O Dancey Debrosse, P/O Jerome Leisher, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims-Lewis v. Clifton T. Pirkins Hospital Center et al
as 1:2017cv02878
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Sims-Lewis
Defendant:
Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center, Danielle R. Robinson and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beall v. Hogan et al
as 8:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
Richard Howard Beall, Jr.
Defendant:
Larry Lawrence Hogan, Tom Lewis, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beall v. Hogan et al
as 8:2017cv00340
Plaintiff:
Richard Howard Beall, Jr.
Defendant:
Govener Lawrance Hogan, 2 East Staff, Paul Vince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims-Lewis v. Potter et al
as 1:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
Raymond Eugene Sims-Lewis
Defendant:
John D. Potter, Baltimore City Police Department and S. Rawlings-Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Lawrence Hogan, Tom Lewis, Nina Diana Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Larry Lawrance Hogan, Tom Lewis, Director Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bechtold v. Hogan et al
as 8:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Brian Anthony Bechtold
Defendant:
Govener Lawrance Hogan, Director Robinson, Tom Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bechtold v. Hogan et al
as 8:2016cv03994
Plaintiff:
Brian Anthony Bechtold
Defendant:
Lawrance Hogan, Robinson, Tom Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims-Lewis et al v. Dangerfield et al
as 1:2016cv03967
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Sims-Lewis
Defendant:
Sgt. Johnson and CO Dangerfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
