Cases 1 - 10 of 8,826
Barmer v. Pentow
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff:
David A. Barmer
Defendant:
Alexander Pentow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Service et al
as 1:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
Vander Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Service, Roxbury Correctional Institution and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Geer v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01658
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Geer
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
Demiqou Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. Msp. Trooper D et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Defendant:
G.T.L., Msp. Trooper D, Sgt. Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Tapia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bazemore v. MCIJ Maryland Institution Jessup
as 1:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
Devonte Bazemore
Defendant:
MCIJ Maryland Institution Jessup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bush
Defendant:
Anthony Brown and St. Mary's County State's Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Yates
as 1:2024cv01627
Plaintiff:
John Green Hill
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Exec. Dir. F. Todd Taylor, Jr, Dept. Dir. Robin Woolford, Warden Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Mills et al
as 1:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Barnes, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer J. Mills, Officer B. Schorck, Officer Rounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
