Cases 1 - 10 of 555
Sechrist v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Victoria Martin Sechrist
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Franklin v. O'Malley
as 5:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Michael Franklin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Darden v. O'Malley
as 5:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Dennis Darden
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PENDERGRASS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
KEISHA PENDERGRASS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Linda Williams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
HADLEY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HADLEY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
LOVE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
TORREY LOVE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
GELLNER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY GELLNER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
NACHMAN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Sherry Ann Nachman
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Robinson v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
Wilmar Robinson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
