Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Mark McBurney v. Nathaniel Young
as 11-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK J. MCBURNEY and ROGER W. HURLBERT
Plaintiff:
BONNIE STEWART, Professor
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHANIEL L. YOUNG, Deputy Commissioner and Director, Division of Child Support Enforcement, Commonwealth of Virginia and THOMAS C. LITTLE, Real Estate Assessment Division, Henrico County, Commonwealth of Virginia
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Virginia and SAMUEL A. DAVIS, Real Estate Assessment Division, Henrico County, Commonwealth of Virginia
Amicus Curiae:
THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEWS EDITORS, ASSOCIATION OF CAPITOL REPORTERS AND EDITORS and others
Mark McBurney v. Nathaniel Young
as 11-1099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK J. MCBURNEY and ROGER W. HURLBERT
Plaintiff:
BONNIE STEWART, Professor
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL L. YOUNG, Deputy Commissioner and Director, Division of Child Support Enforcement, Commonwealth of Virginia and THOMAS C. LITTLE, Real Estate Assessment Division, Henrico County, Commonwealth of Virginia
Defendant:
ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Virginia and SAMUEL A. DAVIS, Real Estate Assessment Division, Henrico County, Commonwealth of Virginia
McBurney et al v. Cuccinelli et al
as 09-1615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK J. MCBURNEY, ROGER W. HURLBERT and BONNIE STEWART, Professor
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT FRANCIS MCDONNELL, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Virginia, WILLIAM CLEVELAND MIMS, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Virginia, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Ward et al v. Simpers et al
as 1:2007cv03266
Plaintiff:
James W. Ward, Golden Arrow Real Estate, Inc. and Golden Arrow Financial, Inc.
Defendant:
Nancy R. Simpers and Sarah Bloom Raskin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
