Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America ex re v. Manor Care, Incorporated
as 17-2069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. PATRICK GERARD CARSON
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. CHRISTINE A. RIBIK
Defendant - Appellee:
MANOR CARE, INCORPORATED, a/k/a HCR Manor Care, Inc., d/b/a HCR Manor Care and HCR MANOR CARE
Defendant:
MANOR CARE - FAIR OAKS OF FAIRFAX VA, LLC, d/b/a Manorcare Health Services - Fair Oaks, MANOR CARE OF ARLINGTON VA, LLC, d/b/a Manorcare Health Services - Arlington, MANOR CARE OF NORTH HILLS OF PITTSBURGH PA, LLC, a/k/a ManorCare Health Services - North Hills and others
:
US ex rel Patrick Carson v. Manor Care, Incorporated
as 16-1035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. PATRICK GERARD CARSON
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. CHRISTINE A. RIBIK
Defendant - Appellee:
MANOR CARE, INCORPORATED, a/k/a HCR Manor Care, Inc., d/b/a HCR Manor Care and HCR MANOR CARE
Defendant:
MANOR CARE - FAIR OAKS OF FAIRFAX VA, LLC, d/b/a Manorcare Health Services - Fair Oaks, MANOR CARE OF ARLINGTON VA, LLC, d/b/a Manorcare Health Services - Arlington, MANOR CARE OF NORTH HILLS OF PITTSBURGH PA, LLC, a/k/a ManorCare Health Services - North Hills and others
:
Hendriks v. Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv00228
Defendant:
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. , Fredric Eshelman , Raymond Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Hendriks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendriks v. Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00176
Defendant:
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. , Fredric Eshelman , Raymond Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Hendriks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dadachanji v. CommScope, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kavasji F Dadachanji
Defendant:
CommScope, Inc., Frank M Drendel, Marvin S Edwards, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
