Cases 111 - 120 of 9,722
Rivera v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00347
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Amber Rivera
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00150
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Debbie Lynn Dixon
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCALES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN SCALES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Albert v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00339
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Arthur Albert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Moody v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00175
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSDC)
STARNES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
RACQEL STARNES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CHESNEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN ELIZABETH CHESNEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Handy v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00331
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Yvette Handy
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
CHAPPELLE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
RONDA CHAPPELLE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Ernst v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00317
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Cody Ernst
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
