Cases 1 - 10 of 57
WOODBURY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WOODBURY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Daniels v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cornitha Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WILLIAMS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DANIEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BOWDEN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gary Bowden
Defendant:
Acting Comm'r S KILOLO KIJAKAZI and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Daniels v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Andrea Daniels
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Earley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Danielle Earley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Guy v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gene Guy, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Daniels v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Cornitha Daniels
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CONTINO v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CONTINO
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Shelton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00216
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shelton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
