Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McFadden v. Kijakazi et al
as 8:2023cv02456
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. McFadden
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Maurice A. Perry, Raghav Kotval and others
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McFadden v. Saul et al
as 8:2021cv01663
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. McFadden
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul, Robert M. Wilson, Raghav Kotval and others
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
William Taccino v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 18-1294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. TACCINO
Plaintiff:
ORGANIZING FOR ACTION WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Volunteer
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Yi v. Maryland Disability Determination Services et al
as 8:2016cv00896
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Maryland Disability Determination Services and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Organizing for Action William A. Taccino v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv02112
Plaintiff:
Organizing for Action William A. Taccino
Defendant:
United States of America, Various Departments and Agencies, President of the U.S.A. Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dvorak v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2009cv01362
Plaintiff:
Linda Dvorak
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney District of Maryland for Cecil County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kimberly Souder v. SSA
as 08-2200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIMBERLY LYNN SOUDER
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Columbia, Maryland
Souder v. Social Security Administration of Columbia, Maryland
as 8:2008cv00854
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lynn Souder
Defendant:
Social Security Administration of Columbia, Maryland
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
