Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tigress McDaniel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 21-2400
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION, LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Tigress McDaniel v. The State of North Carolina
as 21-2126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, SOUTHERN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS COMMISSION ON COLLEGES, NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY and others
Hubert Jason, II v. K. Williams
as 21-7022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUBERT JASON, II
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. K. WILLIAMS, Lieutenant and MR. A. MCDANIELS, Correctional Officer
Defendant:
MR. CALL, Chief Warden, MR. BATEMAN, Major, MS. WARD, Captain and others
John Barfield v. Teressa Cunningham
as 21-6580
Defendant / Appellee:
TERESSA CUNNINGHAM, MAJOR MICHAEL NUNN and FELISHA WILSON
Defendant:
HOPE HATCHELL and ERIC MCDANIEL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN LAWRENCE BARFIELD
US v. Antonio McDaniel
as 20-7579
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO STOWE MCDANIEL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roymad McDaniel v. Jacob Saxon
as 20-6725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROYMAD SHAQUIL MCDANIEL
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDERSON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JACOB SCOTT SAXON, K-9 MAGNUM and others
Kevin McDaniels v. Charles Williams
as 19-7421
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN WAYNE MCDANIELS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
