Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Yimoe Siddha v. Richard Dovey
as 20-7668
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, RICHARD DOVEY, Warden, SGT. SIMMONS, Gang Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YIMOE SIDDHA
Anthony Wright v. Lt. Oxendine
as 20-7411
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT OXENDINE, CHAPLAIN HOVIS, CLAYTON BREWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY WRIGHT
Deaullandy Coleman v. Sergeant Jones
as 20-7382
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN SCHWARPZLOW, Chaplain approves religous diet
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT JONES, Programs and services approves religous diet and MAJOR JOHNSON, Approves religious diet
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEAULLANDY GORAN COLEMAN
Dyrell Muhammad v. Gio Ramirez
as 20-6720
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DYRELL MUHAMMAD
Defendant / Appellee:
NANADA MIDDLETON, Supervisory Chaplain at FCI Williamsburg, individually and in her official capacity and GIO RAMIREZ, Warden, FCI Williamsburg
Jermaine Tart v. Chaplain Hovis
as 20-6244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE ANTWAN TART
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAPLAIN HOVIS
Marcus Alston v. Thomas Eldridge
as 19-7444
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS ELDRIDGE, Clinical Chaplain, CHARLES T. JOHNSON, Assistant Superintendent, BETTY BROWN, Director of Chaplain Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS ALSTON
Todd Dean v. F. Entzel
as 19-7360
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERVISORY CHAPLAIN, UNKNOWN AGENTS, CHAPLAIN FUENTES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD GLENN DEAN
Terrance James-Bey v. NC Dept. of Public Safety
as 19-7093
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ALSTON, KIMBERLY D. GRANDE, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY, a/k/a Terrance Lamount James, a/k/a T. L. James-Bey
Shahid Muslim v. Irwin Carmichael
as 19-6170
Defendant / Appellee:
MADDOX, Chaplain, IRWIN CARMICHAEL, Sheriff and DENNIS, Head Chaplain
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAHID HASSAN MUSLIM
Jordan v. Deavens
as 5:2011mc00051
Plaintiff:
Arkeem Hakim Jordan
Defendant:
Chaplain Deavens
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
