Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
In re: Cigar Association We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2130
Intervenor: SMOKE-FREE ALTERNATIVES TRADE ASSOCIATION- TEXAS, NEW YORK STATE VAPOR ASSOCIATION, CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STEVEN HIRSCH, MD, AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK, LINDA GOLDSTEIN, MD and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Appellant: CIGAR RIGHTS OF AMERICA, PREMIUM CIGAR ASSOCIATION, f/k/a International Premium Cigar and Pipe Retailers Association and In re: CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: MARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HEALTH OFFICERS and STATE OF MARYLAND
American Academy of Pediatrics v. American E-Liquid
as 19-2132
Not Yet Classified: RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, MARYLAND VAPOR ALLIANCE, IOWANS FOR ALTERNATIVE TO SMOKING AND TOBACCO and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESPIRATORY CARE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: LEAH BRASCH, AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK and others
Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. FDA
as 15-1933
Plaintiff - Appellant: MALLINCKRODT, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mallinckrodt Inc. v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 8:2014cv03607
Plaintiff: Mallinckrodt Inc.
Defendant: United States Food and Drug Administration and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sandoz, Incorporated v. Sylvia Burwell
as 14-1922
Plaintiff: HOSPIRA, INCORPORATED
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDOZ INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee: SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, DR. MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: MYLAN INSTITUTIONAL LLC and PAR STERILE PRODUCTS, LLC
Hospira, Incorporated v. Sylvia Burwell
as 14-1920
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOSPIRA, INCORPORATED
Intervenor/Plaintiff: SANDOZ INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee: SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, DR. MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: MYLAN INSTITUTIONAL LLC and PAR STERILE PRODUCTS, LLC
Watson Laboratories, Inc. v. FDA
as 14-1593
Plaintiff: MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INCORPORATED
Intervenor/Plaintiff: LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INCORPORATED
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: WATSON LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INCORPORATED
Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA
as 14-1529
Plaintiff: MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INCORPORATED
Intervenor/Plaintiff: WATSON LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INCORPORATED
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1522
Plaintiff - Appellant: MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INCORPORATED
Intervenor/Plaintiff: WATSON LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED and LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor/Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INCORPORATED
Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Food and Drug Administration
as 8:2014cv01476
Defendant: United States Food and Drug Administration
Plaintiff: Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?