Cases 31 - 40 of 125
In Re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
as 2:2018mc00036
Plaintiff:
In Re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. 2703(d) Directing AT&T Mobility to Disclose Information Related to Celluar Telephone Numbers 681-313-0592
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Raleigh County Commission v. CVS Indiana, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2017cv04484
Plaintiff:
Raleigh County Commission
Defendant:
CVS Indiana, L.L.C., McKesson Corporation, Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Wender et al
as 2:2017cv04377
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Matthew D. Wender , Denise A. Scalph and John G. Brenemen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
AIO Holdings, LLC v. Grayiel
as 1:2017mc00060
Movant:
AIO Holdings, LLC , Greg Anastas and D. Luke Thomas
Respondent:
George A. Grayiel
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Zito NCTNWVPANOH, LLC v. Gatts et al
as 5:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Zito NCTNWVPANOH, LLC
Defendant:
Harley L. Gatts, II , Patricia L. Gatts , Daniel Gatts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Hoosier
as 2:2017mc00131
Petitioner:
Lawyer Disciplinary Board
Respondent:
D. Adrian Hoosier, II
Dobronski v. Alliance Security, Inc. d/b/a AH Security et al
as 5:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
Alliance Security, Inc. d/b/a AH Security
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
