Cases 41 - 50 of 1,043
US v. Daniel Puff
as 23-4457
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL ALAN PUFF
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Banks v. Greenfeld et al
as 1:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Dr. Simon Banks and Dr. Simon Banks, J.D.
Defendant:
STEVEN H GREENFELD, WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB, AS TRUSTEE OF STANWICH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST F C/O WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIEY FSB, DANIEL WALSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Kumar Naharaja v. Thomas Koch
as 23-1627
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUMAR NAHARAJA
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS KENNETH KOCH, individual, an employee of Medical University of South Carolina, THOMAS GREGORY COONEY, Portland VA Medical Center, CARTER DAVIDSON WRAY, individual, a member of OHSU Practice Plan and others
US v. Brandon Daniels
as 23-4320
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON LLOYD DANIELS
Eun Kim v. Parcel K- Tudor Hall Farm LLC
as 23-1482
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUN O. KIM, CHIN KIM, DANIEL I. KIM and others
Plaintiff:
AMY HSIANG-CHI TONG and HONG S. CHUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
PARCEL K- TUDOR HALL FARM LLC
US v. Daniel Watlington
as 23-6431
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL WATLINGTON, a/k/a Gator Slim
US v. Juan Martinez
as 23-4276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN DANIEL MARTINEZ, a/k/a Amigo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Compass Marketing, Inc. v. Flywheel Digital LLC
as 23-1324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMPASS MARKETING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
FLYWHEEL DIGITAL LLC, JAMES COLUMBUS DIPAULA, JR., PATRICK MILLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
