Cases 41 - 50 of 268
Maureen Corneal v. Debra McCurdy
as 21-2063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAUREEN K. CORNEAL and MAUREEN KATERI CORNEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA MCCURDY, Ph. D., KURT SCHMOKE, MICHELLE WILLIAMS and others
Menjivar et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2021cv02355
Plaintiff:
Lennis Landaverde Menjivar, Fernando Turcios Escobar, Ada Rodas Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Angel Rodriguez-Gomez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2125
Petitioner:
ANGEL MOISES RODRIGUEZ-GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Marcos Lopez
as 21-4520
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCOS RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ
Williams Rodriguez Salgado v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1864
Petitioner:
WILLIAMS MAURICIO RODRIGUEZ SALGADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Turcios et al v. Renaud et al
as 8:2021cv01425
Plaintiff:
Katerin Y. Portillo Rodriguez and Maurice Turcios
Defendant:
Director Kathy A. Baran and Acting Director Tracy Renaud
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Danny Rodriguez v. Jason Streeval
as 21-6961
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JASON C. STREEVAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY A. RODRIGUEZ
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Smith
as 21-6847
Defendant / Appellee:
SWAGGER, Commissary Supervisor, RODRIGUEZ, Sergeant, Captain, YOUNG, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Manning
as 21-6846
Defendant / Appellee:
FARR, Correctional Officer, PISTORY, Poplar B Lower Counselor, SPINNET, Correctional Officer FCI Beckley and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Jack Vigue v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6907
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD H. PENCE, Counselor, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK RAY VIGUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
