Cases 71 - 80 of 300
Glenda Garcia-Ventura v. William Barr
as 20-2112
Petitioner:
GLENDA SUYAPA GARCIA-VENTURA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Merlin Mejia-Garcia v. William Barr
as 20-2099
Petitioner:
MERLIN ARACELY MEJIA-GARCIA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Rodrigo Lizama Gutierrez v. Russell Hott
as 20-7448
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES MCHENRY, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, DAVID H. WETMORE, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals and others
Petitioner:
VICTOR QUINTANILLA GALLEGOS, RAFAEL ESCOBAR GARCIA, ENRIQUE PALOMARES REYES and others
Patricia Garcia Cabrera v. William Barr
as 20-1943
Petitioner:
PATRICIA GARCIA CABRERA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Michael Garcia v. J. Bell
as 20-7112
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
J. R. BELL, Warden
Pedro Garcia Lopez v. William Barr
as 20-1756
Petitioner:
GUADALUPE NICOLAS CASTRO, J.J.G.N. and PEDRO GARCIA LOPEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. v. Jorge Garcia
as 20-1689
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI S.P.A., AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI AMERICA, LLC and VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
ANTHONY CRUDUP, ROBERT BRANER and LAMBORGHINI LATINO AMERICA USA
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE ANTONIO FERNANDEZ-GARCIA
Napoleon Garcia Hernandez v. William Barr
as 20-1678
Petitioner:
NAPOLEON GARCIA HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
In re: Martin Teran
as 20-275
Petitioner:
In re: MARTIN TERAN, a/k/a El Chapin, a/k/a Daniel R. Rodriguez, a/k/a David L. Morales Garcia, a/k/a Hugo Roland Gomez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
