Cases 1 - 10 of 1,089
Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Federal Highway Adminstration
as 24-1447
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND CHAPTER OF THE SIERRA CLUB, part of Sierra Club, Inc., NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINSTRATION, STEPHANIE POLLACK, in her capacity as Acting Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, GREGORY MURRILL, in his official capacity as Maryland Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and others
The Official Committee of Asbestos Claimants v. Bestwall LLC
as 24-170
Petitioner:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF ASBESTOS CLAIMANTS OF BESTWALL, LLC
Respondent:
BESTWALL LLC, f/k/a Georgia-Pacific LLC, a Texas limited liability company and a North Carolina limited liability company
Board Of Supervisors Of Accomack County v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Board Of Supervisors Of Accomack County
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Arthur Jones
as 24-1351
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Roland Chalifoux, Jr. v. Wetzel County Hospital, Inc.
as 24-1108
Plaintiff:
ROLAND F. CHALIFOUX, JR., D.O.
Defendant:
WETZEL COUNTY HOSPITAL, INC., WEST VIRGINIA UNITED HEALTH SYSTEM, INCORPORATED, d/b/a West Virginia University Health System, d/b/a WVU Health System, DONALD BLUM, M.D. and others
FX Aviation Capital LLC v. Hector Guerrero
as 24-1027
Plaintiff:
FX AVIATION CAPITAL LLC
Defendant:
HECTOR GUERRERO, MARK LIKER, ANATOLY GALUNOV and others
Smith et al v. Inova Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Smith and Michael F. Smith
Defendant:
Inova Hospital, Eric Lyda, Mary Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
