Cases 1 - 10 of 29
US v. Malik Al-Shabazz
as 24-6068
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MALIK AL-SHABAZZ, a/k/a Beaver, a/k/a Beaver G
US v. Bernard Celestine
as 23-6767
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BERNARD CELESTINE, a/k/a Speed, a/k/a Beaver
US v. Jamel Lunsford
as 23-4379
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL TYREE LUNSFORD, a/k/a Action, a/k/a Beaver
US v. Bernard Celestine
as 22-7152
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BERNARD CELESTINE, a/k/a Speed, a/k/a Beaver
Beavers v. THS Group LLC
as 2:2022cv02429
Plaintiff:
Michael Beavers
Defendant:
THS Group LLC doing business as ServicePlus Home Warranty formerly doing business as Total Home Protection
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Trevor Mohammed v. Kenneth Beaver
as 21-7404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TREVOR MOHAMMED
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH BEAVER, RONDAL PRESTON TOWNSEND, a/k/a Rondal Townsend, PAMELA CHAPMAN and others
US v. Malik Al-Shabazz
as 21-4491
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MALIK AL-SHABAZZ, a/k/a Beaver, a/k/a Beaver G
Jonathan Newell v. North Carolina Industrial Commission
as 21-7094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, PHILIP A. BADDOUR, JR., KIMBERLY D. GRANDE and others
David Schnebelen v. Erik Hooks
as 21-6209
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID SCHNEBELEN
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSH STEIN, North Carolina Attorney General, MIKE SLAGLE, Mountain View CI Superintendent and ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary of Department of Public Safety, this respondent was initially named as other Kenneth Beaver
Franklin Smith v. Cpl. D. Beavers
as 20-2329
Defendant / Appellee:
J. VARGAS, Captain, D. A. TAYLOR, Deputy/Intel, CPL. DEVO, Corporal and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
