Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jordan Jones v. George Solomon
as 21-7239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN ANDREW JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, W. DAVID GUICE, Commissioner of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, FRANK L. PERRY, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Defendant:
FNU WILLIAMS, Inmate Grievance Examiner for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, ELIZABETH D. WALLACE, Inmate Grievance Examiner for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, JASMINE BELYEU, Inmate Grievance Examiner for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Corey Hood v. Bureau of Prisons
as 21-6985
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, BELLAMY, Lieutenant, CAUDILL, Nurse and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY DEANDRE HOOD
Tyrone Shelton v. John Walrath
as 21-6655
Defendant:
L. WANG, Prison Physician; All sued in their individual and official capacities, T. COBBS, Registered Nurse, TIM DOMINICK, Physician Assistant; All sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee:
S. W. ALLEN, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; All sued in their individual and official capacities, DARRELL L. MILLER, Warden; All sued in their individual and official capacities, JOHN WALRATH, Regional Administrator; All sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE SHELTON
Joe Baltas v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6590
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER J. MILGRAM, In His Individual and Official Capacities, SERGEANT LITTLE, In His Individual and Official Capacities, UNIT MANAGER ERIC MILLER, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE BALTAS
Christopher Johnson v. Todd Ishee
as 21-6296
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL C. COLLINS, Unit Manager, Caledonia Correctional, MS. MASON, Superintendent, Caledonia Correctional, RANDELL RICHARDSON, Correctional Officer, Caledonia Correctional and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Kayie Wright v. Christopher Rich
as 20-7428
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY SWINK, Program Director of RDU, in individual, official, and supervisory capacities, LONG, [Captain] of S.R.G., in individual, official, and supervisory capacities, JULIA JENKINS, Program Director of RDU, in individual, official, and supervisory capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAYIE SHAUNE DEVORE WRIGHT, a/k/a Kayie Shaune Wright
Ajanaku Murdock v. FNU Horne
as 20-7417
Defendant / Appellee:
DISCIPLINARY APPELLATE COMMITTEE, HORNE, Assistant Unit Manager, FACILITY CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AJANAKU E. MURDOCK
Jonathan Henslee v. Sgt. Stoppell
as 20-6914
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. STOPPELL, DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER, ERIK A. HOOKS, DPS Secretary and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEIGH HENSLEE
Alfutir Mayweather v. W. Guice
as 20-6299
Defendant / Appellee:
W. DAVID GUICE, Commissioner, Department of Public Safety NC, Official and Individual Capacity, LIEUTENANT BANKS, Shipping and Receiving, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity, GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director, Department of Public Safety NC, Official and Individual Capacity and others
Defendant:
J. JENKINS, Correctional Planner, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity, H. CORPENING, Correctional Administrator, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity, SERGEANT SPENCER, Investigating Officer, Hyde Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFUTIR KAREEM IDEEN MAYWEATHER
John Alexander v. Bryan Stirling
as 20-6248
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KURT STEVENS, Agent Individial and Official Capacities, M. N. BARKER, Disciplinary Hearing Officer Individial and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
