Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Progressive Church v. Progressive Church-Tallahassee
as 21-1763
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE CHURCH OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE CHURCH OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST-TALLAHASSEE, INC.
Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Lawrence Hogan
as 20-2311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REV. JAMES WICKHAM, REV. FREDRICK CAUDLE, DELEGATE WARREN MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WOODROW W. JONES, III, in his official capacity as Maryland State Police Superintendent, JINLENE CHAN, in her official capacity as Acting Deputy Secretary for Public Health Services, DENNIS R. SHRADER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Maryland Health Department and others
Plaintiff:
REV. GARY POMRENKE and ADVENTURE PARK USA, LLC
Charles vonRosenberg v. Mark Lawrence
as 20-2295
Defendant / Appellant:
HOLY APOSTLES, BARNWELL, THE RIGHT REVEREND MARK J. LAWRENCE, ST. PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF BENNETTSVILLE, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE RIGHT REVEREND CHARLES G VONROSENBERG, individually and in his capacity as Provisional Bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina, THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN SOUTH CAROLINA and THE RIGHT REVEREND GLADSTONE B. ADAMS, III, individually and in his capacity as the Provisional Bishop of The Episcopal Church in South Carolina
Defendant:
CHRIST THE KING, WACCAMAW, THE VESTRY AND CHURCH WARDENS OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE PARISH OF PRINCE GEORGE WINYAH, CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION, MYRTLE BEACH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
Norman Launi, II v. Hampshire Co. Prosecuting Aty
as 20-2010
Defendant:
COLONEL CAHILL, Superintendent of the West Virginia State Police, in his official capacity, MORGAN COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, CORPORA SCOTT NAZELROD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN JAMES, JR., Individually and in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Hampshire and Morgan Counties, JOHN OURS, Individually and in his official capacity as Special Prosecutor in Mineral County, COUNTY COMMISSION OF MORGAN COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN LAUNI, II
Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Lawrence Hogan
as 20-1579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REV. JAMES WICKHAM, REV. FREDRICK CAUDLE, DELEGATE WARREN MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCES B. PHILLIPS, in her official capacity as Dpt. Sec. for Public Health Services, WOODROW W. JONES, III, in his official capacity as Maryland State Police Superintendent, LAWRENCE HOGAN, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff:
REV. GARY POMRENKE
Episcopal Church in SC v. Church Insurance Company of VT
as 20-1143
3Rd Party Defendant:
ST. JOHN EPISCOPAL CHURCH, EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE HOLY COMFORTER, CHURCH OF THE CROSS, a/k/a Church of the Cross, Inc. and Church of the Cross Declaration of Trust and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHURCH INSURANCE COMPANY OF VERMONT and THE CHURCH INSURANCE COMPANY OF VERMONT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN SOUTH CAROLINA
Charles vonRosenberg v. Mark Lawrence
as 20-1061
Defendant / Appellant:
HOLY APOSTLES, BARNWELL, THE RIGHT REVEREND MARK J. LAWRENCE, ST. PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF BENNETTSVILLE, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE RIGHT REVEREND CHARLES G VONROSENBERG, individually and in his capacity as Provisional Bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina, THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN SOUTH CAROLINA and THE RIGHT REVEREND GLADSTONE B. ADAMS, III, individually and in his capacity as the Provisional Bishop of The Episcopal Church in South Carolina
Defendant:
THE VESTRIES AND CHURCHWARDENS OF THE PARISH OF ST. ANDREWS, CHRIST THE KING, WACCAMAW, THE VESTRY AND CHURCH WARDENS OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE PARISH OF PRINCE GEORGE WINYAH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
Charles vonRosenberg v. Church of the Cross, Inc.
as 19-2163
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRIST CHURCH, FLORENCE, ST. PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF BENNETTSVILLE, INC., THE VESTRY AND WARDENS OF ST. PAUL'S CHURCH, SUMMERVILLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE RIGHT REVEREND CHARLES G VONROSENBERG, individually and in his capacity as Provisional Bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina, THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN SOUTH CAROLINA and THE RIGHT REVEREND GLADSTONE B. ADAMS, III, individually and in his capacity as the Provisional Bishop of The Episcopal Church in South Carolina
Defendant:
CHRIST THE KING, WACCAMAW, THE CORPORATION CURRENTLY CALLING ITSELF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, THE TRUSTEES OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Not Yet Classified:
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
Charles vonRosenberg v. Mark Lawrence
as 19-2112
Defendant:
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH, PINOPOLIS, BERKELEY COUNTY STRAWBERRY CHAPEL, ST. ANDREW'S MISSION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THE RIGHT REVEREND MARK J. LAWRENCE, THE CORPORATION CURRENTLY CALLING ITSELF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and THE TRUSTEES OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN SOUTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE RIGHT REVEREND CHARLES G VONROSENBERG, individually and in his capacity as Provisional Bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina and THE RIGHT REVEREND GLADSTONE B. ADAMS, III, individually and in his capacity as the Provisional Bishop of The Episcopal Church in South Carolina
Plaintiff:
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN SOUTH CAROLINA
Not Yet Classified:
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-1614
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae:
SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, ALABAMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
