Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jack Vigue v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6907
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD H. PENCE, Counselor, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK RAY VIGUE
E.V. Drake v. Travelers Indemnity Company
as 20-1913
Defendant / Appellee:
EAST TEXAS BRIDGE, INC., SASHA MORENO, JOANNA BREYER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC V. DRAKE, a/k/a E. V. Drake
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Trump
as 20-6934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE PENCE, DONALD J. TRUMP and MITCH MCCONNELL
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Trump
as 20-6907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE PENCE, DONALD J. TRUMP and MITCH MCCONNELL
John Demos, Jr. v. Mitch McConnell
as 20-6845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, MITCH MCCONNELL, U.S. Senate Majority Leader and MIKE PENCE, Vice President of the United States
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Trump
as 20-6727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE PENCE, DONALD J. TRUMP and MITCH MCCONNELL
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Trump
as 20-6655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SENATOR MITCH MCCONNELL, U.S. Senate Majority Leader, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the USA and MIKE PENCE, Vice President of the USA
Eric Drake v. Travelers Indemnity Company
as 19-2368
Defendant / Appellee:
EAST TEXAS BRIDGE, INC., SASHA MORENO, JOANNA BREYER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC V. DRAKE
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II v. Sebelius
as 3:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Amicu:
Ray Elbert Parker, American Center for Law and Justice , Todd Akin and others
Movant:
Steven J. Willis , Eve Ellingwood, American Civil Rights Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
