Cases 1 - 9 of 9
The Baltimore Life Insurance Company v. Quattlebaum et al
as 1:2018cv00968
Plaintiff:
The Baltimore Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Terry D. Quattlebaum, Brendalyn Quattlebaum, John T Rhines Funeral Home LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
US v. Furman Quattlebaum
as 17-6483
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FURMAN BENJAMIN QUATTLEBAUM
US v. Furman Quattlebaum
as 15-7663
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FURMAN BENJAMIN QUATTLEBAUM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv02688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Emmett Quattlebaum
as 12-6240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMMETT QUATTLEBAUM
US v. Randy Quattlebaum
as 08-7476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDY LINDIAL QUATTLEBAUM
US v. Furman Quattlebaum
as 08-4777
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FURMAN BENJAMIN QUATTLEBAUM
Party-in-Interest - None:
RANDY MARTIN, LUTHER BRYAN, ALISIA H. AKBAR and others
Pete Cuming v. South Carolina Lottery Commiss
as 08-158
Petitioner:
PETE CUMING, individually and as representatives of a class of people similarly situated, JAMES A. BENTON, individually and as representatives of a class of people similarly situated and DOROTHY MCFADDEN, individually and as representatives of a class of people similarly situated
Respondent:
SOUTH CAROLINA LOTTERY COMMISSION, A. MARVIN QUATTLEBAUM, JR., in their official positions as members of the Board of Commissioners of the South Carolina Lottery Commission, T. MOFFATT BURRIS, in their official positions as members of the Board of Commissioners of the South Carolina Lottery Commission and others
US v. James M. Quattlebaum
as 07-4676
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MATTHEW QUATTLEBAUM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
