Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Bishop of Charleston v. Marcia Adams
as 22-1175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, d/b/a Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston, a Corporation Sole and SOUTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCIA ADAMS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Administration, BRIAN GAINES, in his official capacity as budget director for the South Carolina Department of Administration and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina
Intervenor Defendant:
ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Robert Graham, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 21-7562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT GRAHAM, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, FLORENCE COUNTY COURT SYSTEMS and ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General
Bishop of Charleston v. Orangeburg County
as 21-1912
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, d/b/a Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston, a Corporation Sole and SOUTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, MARCIA ADAMS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Administration, BRIAN GAINES, in his official capacity as budget director for the South Carolina Department of Administration and others
Intervenor Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
as 21-1759
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant:
CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Intervenor:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Defenders of Wildlife v. State of South Carolina
as 21-1708
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Intervenor Defendant:
CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Defenders of Wildlife v. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
as 21-1589
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Alan Wilson
as 21-1369
Defendant:
EDWARD SIMMER, in his official capacity as Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, SCARLETT A. WILSON, in her official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 9th Judicial Circuit, CHRISTOPHER C. WRIGHT, in his official capacity as a Member of the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GREENVILLE WOMEN'S CLINIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff, PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff and TERRY L. BUFFKIN, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients
Intervenor:
HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of South Carolina and JAMES H. LUCAS, a/k/a Jay, in his official capacity as Speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM WALTER WILKINS, III, in his official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 13th Judicial Circuit and ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Robert Foster v. Larry Powell
as 21-6279
Defendant / Appellee:
SPARTANBURG CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, TONY FISHER, Director, J. L. HALL, Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE FOSTER
United Resource Systems Inc v. State of South Carolina, The
as 3:2021cv00364
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The
Plaintiff:
United Resource Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Clayton Jones v. State of South Carolina
as 21-6179
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA AND ITS AGENTS, individually and officially
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAYTON T. JONES and CLAYTON THOMAS JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
