Cases 1 - 10 of 23
State of Georgia v. FERC
as 24-1760
Petitioner:
GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and STATE OF GEORGIA
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amy Bryant v. Joshua Stein
as 24-1617
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, PHD MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, M.D., KODY H. KINSLEY, in his official capacity as the North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL and others
Amy Bryant v. William Brawley
as 24-1600
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, KODY H. KINSLEY, in his official capacity as the North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services, PHD MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, M.D. and others
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Amicus Curiae:
FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Amy Bryant v. Timothy Moore
as 24-1576
Defendant:
PHD, FNP-BC SHARONA Y. JOHNSON, WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, JD JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board and others
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, NC VALUES INSTITUTE, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL and others
Marilyn Seay Propst v. State of West Virginia
as 23-2112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARILYN E. SEAY PROPST
Plaintiff:
DAWN PROPST, CHARLES PROPST, DAWN LOCKARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, JERRY MOORE, JEFF BOWERS and others
Seay et al v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Marilyn E Seay Propst, Charles Propst, Kathy Propst and others
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Jerry Moore, Jeff Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Joe Biden
as 21-6012
Defendant / Appellee:
U S SUPREME COURT, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, State Electorial Administrators, Prison & School Systems, STATE OF WISCONSIN, State Electorial Administrators & Prison Authorities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Dakota Nelson v. Vera McCormick
as 20-1861
Defendant:
MAC WARNER, in his official capacity as West Virginia Secretary of State
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA DEMOCRATIC HOUSE LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE, BELINDA BIAFORE, individually and as Chairperson of the West Virginia Democratic Party, ELAINE A. HARRIS, individually and as Chairperson of the Kanawha County Democratic Executive Committee and others
Amicus Curiae:
HONEST ELECTIONS PROJECT, STATE OF GEORGIA and STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant / Appellant:
VERA MCCORMICK, in her official capacity as Clerk of Kanawha County, West Virginia and all county ballot commissioners for the state of West Virginia
Dakota Nelson v. Mac Warner
as 20-1860
Defendant:
VERA MCCORMICK, in her official capacity as Clerk of Kanawha County, West Virginia and all county ballot commissioners for the state of West Virginia
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA DEMOCRATIC HOUSE LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE, BELINDA BIAFORE, individually and as Chairperson of the West Virginia Democratic Party, ELAINE A. HARRIS, individually and as Chairperson of the Kanawha County Democratic Executive Committee and others
Amicus Curiae:
HONEST ELECTIONS PROJECT, STATE OF GEORGIA and STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant / Appellant:
MAC WARNER, in his official capacity as West Virginia Secretary of State
Frederick Banks v. Republic of Sudan
as 20-6618
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, MAYA ENERGY and others
Petitioner:
R. KELLY, SIX HIGH SCHOOLERS, in Gary, Indiana, GLEN JONES, Pinaca, NV home and car bomber and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS, next friend thereto
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
