Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 2.36 Acres of Land, Owned by EST Enterprises, LLC, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
2.36 Acres of Land, Owned by EST Enterprises, LLC, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 8.24 Acres of Land, Owned by EST Enterprises, LLC, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
8.24 Acres of Land, Owned by EST Enterprises, LLC, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
United States of America v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Walter N. Estes, Alan Todd Greene, Savannah Rose Forestry, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Estes et al
as 1:2014cv00156
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Walter N. Estes, Alan Todd Greene, Savannah Rose Forestry, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
