Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Truist Bank et al v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank and Trustee Services of Virginia, LLC
Defendant:
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Donald L Hipple, Jr and Trustee Francis B Simkins, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Truist Bank et al v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank and Trustee Services of Virginia, LLC
Defendant:
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Mary B Thomas, John Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Truist Bank et al v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank f/k/a Branch Banking and Trust Company, Trustee Services of Virginia, LLC and Truist Bank
Defendant:
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, John Myers, Trustee, Donald Ritenour, Trustee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 4.69 Acres of Land, Owned by Donald Deboe and Kim G. Deboe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
4.69 Acres of Land, Owned by Donald Deboe and Kim G. Deboe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 11.86 Acres of Land, Owned by Donald B. Barnhart
as 7:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
11.86 Acres of Land, Owned by Donald B. Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Jackson v. Blessing et al
as 3:2021cv00772
Plaintiff:
Woodrow R. Jackson, Sr
Defendant:
Hon. Donald C. Blessing, Lynette Coe, Machelle Eppes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United Services Automobile Association as subrogee of Major Donald Porter v. W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United Services Automobile Association as subrogee of Major Donald Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Giles County, Craig County, Montgomery County, Roanoke County, Franklin County, and Pittsylvania County, Vir et al
as 7:2017cv00492
Defendant:
1.97 Acres of Land, Owned by Keith M. Wilson and Mary K. Wilson, 3.76 Acres of Land, Owned by Catherine Beckner Kingery, 2.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Howard M. Thompson and Christine W. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Tammy Belinsky and Daniel Breslau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
In Re: Lumber Liquidators Chinese-Manufactured Flooring Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2015md02627
Plaintiff:
Dwight Spence, Tracie-Linn Tyrrell, Frank Graham and others
In Re:
In Re: Lumber Liquidators Chinese-Manufactured Flooring Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Defendant:
EDLab Environmental Diagnostics Laboratory, Lumber Liquidators, Unknown Parties and others
Interested Party:
Brice M. Johnston and Diana Cantu-Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
