Cases 51 - 60 of 453
Buis v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01266
Plaintiff:
John Buis
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Nesvit v. PFJ Southeast LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Vasyl Nesvit
Defendant:
PFJ Southeast LLC doing business as Pilot Travel Center 275, Pilot Travel Centers LLC doing business as Pilot Flying J, Donald Lackey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LU et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
ZHIYUE LU and HUIZHI BAI
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND and JOHN ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cathcart v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
John Everett Cathcart
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Mussery v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
John A. Mussery
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Clanton v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
John W. Clanton
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
LAFFERTY v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
JOHN LAFFERTY
Defendant:
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, C.R. BARD, INC., BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Catalano v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01156
Plaintiff:
John Catalano
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Moye et al v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Lisa Moye and Theodore Moye
Defendant:
John Ferguson, Pivot Supply Chain Solutions, Carrier 411 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Brown v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
John Brown
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
