Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Hughes v. Cartiva, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Bryan Hughes
Defendant:
Cartiva, Inc., Wright Medical Group, N.V. and Stryker, B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kaniecki et al v. Adams et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Mark Kaniecki and Rebecca Kaniecki
Defendant:
Kyle Bryan Adams and Top Shelf Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Swiger et al v. A.R. Wilfley & Sons, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00117
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc., PREMIERE REFRACTORIES, INC., Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Swiger and Lyle Swiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bryan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00692
Plaintiff:
Vanya Bryan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnaon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaus et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Bryan Gaus and Danielle Gaus
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03479
Plaintiff:
Kimberley Bryan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaus et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Bryan Gaus , Danielle Gaus , A.G. and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rozencwaig et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01856
Plaintiff:
Karen Rozencwaig and Bryan Rozencwaig
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00895
Plaintiff:
Andrea Bryan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michaels et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11634
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Petry Michaels and Bryan Michels
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
