Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cupp v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00035
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Fiat Chrysler Corporation US LLC
Plaintiff:
Sophia Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blankenship v. Fox News Network, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Honorable Andrew Napolitano, Howie Klein, Martin Pengelly and others
Plaintiff:
Don Blankenship
Petitioner:
Christopher Stirewalt and Fox Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Myers et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07916
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cupps Myers and Terry Myers
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04430
Plaintiff:
Peggy Cupp
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01219
Plaintiff:
Trudy Cupp and Lee Caswell Cupp
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv06476
Plaintiff:
Vicki Cupp
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31449
Plaintiff:
Lena M. Cupp
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27032
Plaintiff:
Ruth A. Cupp
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23117
Plaintiff:
Patrica Cupp and Leland Cupp
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07399
Plaintiff:
Brenda Cupp and Garnet Cupp
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
