Cases 121 - 130 of 17,272
Walls v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jachin Boaz Walls, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Carlos Bivens, Dr. Kyle Smith, Andrea Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Holtzinger v. Rowe
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Defendant:
Craig Rowe, Todd Faith, Melissa Lookabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Edward Witherspoon
Defendant:
Ronald S Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gross v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01247
Petitioner:
Donald Gross
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DePaola v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Eric DePaola
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, Annie D. Harvey, F. Todd Taylor, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, NDZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Nines et al
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Brian Andrew Davis and Joan Ann Davis
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Nines, Assistant Warden Ronald Weber, Cheif of Security Bradley Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. St. Clair et al
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ja-mo Kimu Smith
Defendant:
Scott Alan St. Clair, Scott Huff and Hagerstown Poice Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hinton
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrick v. Dean, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Larnell E. Hendrick
Defendant:
Robert Dean, Jr., Lieutnant Ahmed, Dr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
