Cases 11 - 20 of 17,309
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01837
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Clark-El v. The Department of Correction et al
as 1:2024cv01884
Plaintiff:
Hammel J. Clark-El
Defendant:
The Department of Correction, The Commissioner of Correction Ms. Annae Harvey, Warden of (JCI), Mr. Robert Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stitely v. John's Hopkins Otolaryngology et al
as 1:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
David Stitely
Defendant:
John's Hopkins Otolaryngology and Alenezi Abdulrahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Horne v. USA
as 1:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Horne
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Kafritsas et al
as 1:2024cv01766
Plaintiff:
James Kareem Day
Defendant:
Sgt. Kafritsas, Warden Abello and Marc Elrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Warden RCI
as 1:2024cv01834
Plaintiff:
Daquan L Tyler
Defendant:
Warden RCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv01836
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kieth Arnold, Marvin Metz, Ronald Stotler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01835
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turnipseed v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
Melvin Turnipseed
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenstry v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv01760
Plaintiff:
Lamar McKenstry
Defendant:
Robert S. Dean, Jr., Robin Woolford, Adebukola Adewole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
