Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Campbell v. USA-2255
as 1:2021cv03043
Petitioner:
Alexander Campbell
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Campbell v. USA-2255
as 1:2021cv02457
Petitioner:
Harrington Campbell
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01980
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lester v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2021cv00879
Defendant:
Valerie Hunt, Dominique Booker, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Lester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Longstreet v. Campbell et al
as 1:2021cv00315
Defendant:
Warden Casey M. Campbell and Stacey Taylor
Plaintiff:
Wysan R. Longstreet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Longstreet v. Campbell et al
as 1:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Stacey Taylor and Casey M. Campbell
Plaintiff:
Wysan R. Longstreet
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stedman v. Campbell
as 1:2020cv03331
Defendant:
Warden Casey M. Campbell, Commissioner of Corrections and Robert L. Green
Plaintiff:
Merrick Stedman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kelly v. Hill et al
as 1:2020cv02531
Defendant:
Kristofer Davis, Commissioner Wayne Hill, Lander Walley and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Kelly
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Maryland Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services
as 1:2020cv02714
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, Robert L Green, Casey Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Green v. Campbell et al
as 8:2020cv02527
Plaintiff:
Marquis Green
Defendant:
Five John Does, Casey Campbell, Three Toll Shift Control Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
