Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2017cv00607
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Jack Baber, Jason Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawley v. Ponton et al
as 2:2012cv00685
Plaintiff:
David Crawley
Defendant:
Henry J. Ponton, J. Towneson, T. Jarrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2012cv00572
Defendant:
K. Campbell, Department Of Corrections, J. E. Glover and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Willis et al
as 7:2012cv00389
Defendant:
Lieutenant Adkins, C/O Clarke, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Roy Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2012cv00355
Defendant:
C/O K. Campbell, Department of Corrections, Lt. Glover and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus N. Jennings v. USA
as 6:2012cv80476
Petitioner:
Marcus Nikita Jennings
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Arehart v. Holloway et al
as 7:2012cv00215
Plaintiff:
Ronald Arehart
Defendant:
Gregory Holloway and W.D. Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bloom v. Jennings
as 7:2012cv00057
Petitioner:
Daniel V.F. Bloom
Defendant:
W.D. Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlow v. Jennings
as 7:2011cv00591
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and William D. Jennings
Petitioner:
Timothy Robert Harlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Pruett et al
as 7:2011cv00571
Defendant:
Warden Jennings, Inspector General J. Jennings, Sgt. Kenndy and others
Plaintiff:
Damion Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
