Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Gary Boone v. Warden, USP Lee County
as 11-6872
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY DEAN BOONE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, USP LEE COUNTY
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY, Warden, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ALLENWOOD, PENNSYLVANIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Todd Cooper v. Kuma Deboo
as 10-6601
Petitioner - Appellant:
TODD COOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
KUMA DEBOO, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Gilmer
Henry Miller v. US
as 10-6107
Petitioner - Appellant:
HENRY EARL MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION EDGEFIELD
Thomas Breland, III v. US
as 09-7985
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON BRELAND, III
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION EDGEFIELD
Henry Miller v. US
as 09-7228
Petitioner - Appellant:
HENRY EARL MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION EDGEFIELD
Frank Skinner v. US
as 08-8221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK SKINNER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPIN, Director and others
Jonathan Riches v. Coleman Fenton
as 08-7970
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
COLEMAN FENTON and WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg
Jonathan Riches v. Marshall Safir
as 08-7967
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
MARSHALL P. SAFIR and WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg
Jonathan Riches v. Harold Haimowitz
as 08-7972
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD HAIMOWITZ, WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Jonathan Riches v. Michael Thevis
as 08-7968
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL G. THEVIS, BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
