Cases 51 - 60 of 467
Johnson v. Warden
as 1:2022cv02261
Plaintiff:
Oloyede Johnson
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pronin v. Dr. Moore et al
as 1:2022cv01864
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin and Leyleen Lillith Aquino
Defendant:
Dr. Moore, Dr. Venk, O Johnson A.W. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. D.O.C. Security Operations et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Reginald Walker
Defendant:
D.O.C. Security Operations, Secretary of DPSCS, Executive Director Inmate Grievance Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gootee v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01528
Petitioner:
K'lin C. Gootee
Respondent:
Orlando Johnson and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01410
Plaintiff:
Larry Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Warden, C. Carter, D. Holler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Shawn Price
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Renard Brooks, Major Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Terrence Hammock
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Renard Brooks, Major Robert Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv01362
Plaintiff:
Harry Allen, II
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Doctor Zowie Barnes, Dietary Sgt. G. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogunlana v. USA - 2255
as 1:2022cv01154
Petitioner:
Johnson B. Ogunlana
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. USA-2255
as 1:2022cv00892
Petitioner:
Oloyede Johnson
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
