Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 61 - 70 of 32,521
Bingham v. Shaw et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff: Ta'Kuan Bingham and Ta
Defendant: Jefferey William Shaw, Monique Watson Donner, Dana Anne Fantozzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feagin v. Bass et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff: Christopher Feagin
Defendant: Bass, Nabong, Baton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxey v. Sivels et al
as 1:2024cv01035
Plaintiff: Robert S. Maxey, Jr.
Defendant: Chap Sivels, Carpenter, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmuhl v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00375
Petitioner: Andrew Gilbert Schmuhl
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rutherford v. Haynes
as 7:2024cv00374
Plaintiff: Michael A. Rutherford
Defendant: Dr. Greg Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Dotson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00433
Petitioner: Larry Edwin Patterson
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv01037
Petitioner: Edward L. Watson and Leonard Watson
Respondent: Chadwick K. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Brown, DDS, et al.
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff: James R. Wood
Defendant: J. Brown, DDS and L. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thompson v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00378
Petitioner: Lawrence E. Thompson, Jr.
Respondent: Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?