Cases 81 - 90 of 174
McQueen v. MCTC Division of Correction
as 8:2015cv03980
Plaintiff:
Jason Alexander McQueen
Defendant:
MCTC Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Divisions of Corrections
as 8:2015cv03770
Plaintiff:
Jeremontrel Davis
Defendant:
Divisions of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2015cv03143
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Division of Corrections/Patuxent Institution, Dr. Moghe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Division of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv02510
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Division of Correction and Mental Health Management Company Clifton T Pirkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Maryland Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv02185
Plaintiff:
Neal Eugene McDonald
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Corrections, Maryland Corr. Training Center, Morgan, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Maryland Division of Corrections
as 1:2015cv01635
Plaintiff:
Ruben Perez
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01585
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stewart, Jr. v. Maryland Division of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv01287
Plaintiff:
Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Correction , Frank Bishop, Jr. , Bradley Wilt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Maryland Division of Correction et al
as 8:2014cv03312
Petitioner:
Raymond Atkins
Respondent:
Maryland Division of Correction, Kathleen Green and Norman Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaechtel v. Maryland Division of Correction et al
as 8:2014cv02099
Plaintiff:
Johnny J. Schaechtel
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Correction, Greeg L. Hershberger, Jessup Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
