Cases 81 - 90 of 17,260
Hill v. Vaughey et al
as 1:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hill
Defendant:
John Vaughey, Jack Truppo Burbage, John Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinkins v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01178
Petitioner:
Anthony Dinkins
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Thurston v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01095
Petitioner:
Richard Thurston
Respondent:
Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
El-Bey v. Ndze et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Ndze, Farinloye and Boyd Cod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Washington v. N.B.C.I. Administrative Review Team et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant:
N.B.C.I. Administrative Review Team, Wagner, Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
