Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6314
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-7657
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeffrey Cohen v. William Quarles, Jr.
as 16-7412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRIAN COHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., U.S. District Judge
Jeffrey Cohen v. Rod Rosenstein
as 16-7313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRIAN COHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, US Attorney, HARRY MASON GRUBER, Asst. US Attorney and JOYCE KALLAM MCDONALD, Asst. US Attorney
Jeffrey Cohen v. Brendan Hurson
as 15-6722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRIAN COHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENDAN ABELL HURSON, Federal Public Defender, DEBORAH LYNN BOARDMAN, Federal Public Defender and JAMES WYDA, Federal Public Defender
Jeffrey Cohen v. Rod Rosenstein
as 15-6193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRIAN COHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, US Attorney, HARRY MASON GRUBER, Asst. US Attorney and JOYCE KALLAM MCDONALD, Asst. US Attorney
Jeffrey Cohen v. Michael Shao
as 15-6180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRIAN COHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL SHAO, In his personal and official capacity as Special Agent, KALLIOPI MULLINS-TSERKIS, In her personal and official capacity as Postal Inspector, MS. JENNIFER PERRY, In her personal and official capacity as Special Agent and others
Jeffrey Cohen v. Rod Rosenstein
as 15-6157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRIAN COHEN
Plaintiff:
DAMIEN RILEY, CHRISTOPHER PALMER, KENNETH BAINES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, US Attorney, HARRY MASON GRUBER, Asst. US Attorney, JOYCE KALLAM MCDONALD, Asst. US Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
