Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Gaskins v. Back et al
as 7:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
John C. Gaskins
Defendant:
Warden Tim Back, Major Stokes and Captain Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Taylor et al
as 7:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Jenifer Gordon
Respondent:
Michael W. Taylor, Brian H. Turpin, Mary Kathryn Pendleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Smith
as 7:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Gordon Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Cynthia J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chhipo v. Casey et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Chhipo
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Chief Gordon, Director Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chhipa v. Casey et al
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Chhipa
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Chief Gordon and Captain Lytle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Roberts et al
as 7:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Deandre Jaquan Gordon
Defendant:
C/O Roberts, Warden Jeffery C. Artrip, A.W. James Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chhipa v. Gordon et al
as 3:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Chhipa
Defendant:
Chief Gordon, Sgt. Juarez, Deputy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Jolley et al
as 7:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ve'lle Parks
Defendant:
Robert Jolley and Gordon Britton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Stumpf et al
as 7:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Deandre Jaquan Gordon
Defendant:
C/O Stumpf, C/O Sexton, C/O T.J. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Willis et al
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Richie Leo Williams
Defendant:
Gordon F. Willis, Ms. Greenlaw, Victoria B. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
